As part of the closing conference for the Alien Energy research project, we are pleased to invite you to the following public lectures at the ITU in October.
Professor Stefan Helmreich
“The Water Next Time: Changing Wavescapes in the Anthropocene”
Wednesday Oct 19 at 16:00 in Aud 2, IT University of Copenhagen, Rued Langgaards Vej 7, 2300
Do ocean waves have a history? The question may sound odd: surely waves are simple facts of nature, matters of the substance of the sea. Waves may have diverse manifestations in marine and maritime lore, a variety of effects on economic and political enterprise, and a range of meanings for fishers, surfers, and swimmers. But as formal and material entities, the standard view might say, they are best known by a science arriving at ever-improving models of oscillation, undulation, and movement. Historians of oceanography have complicated such a view, documenting the changing systems through which scientists and seafarers have known waves. This presentation will go further, looking toward a future in which waves are not only known differently (though new kinds of computer modeling, for example) but also become differently composed material phenomena than once they were. Today’s wave scientists and modelers are predicting that climate change may not only transform the global distribution of significant wave heights, but also may also amplify the frequency of rogue or freak waves, changing the world’s wavescape. Others turn to waves as new sources of energy. This presentation will deliver a history of ocean wave modeling in order to anchor an ethnographic report on how scientists think about whether waves may be transforming — or remade — in synchrony with the political, economic, and social scene of the Anthropocene.
Associate Professor Noortje Marres
“What if nothing happens? On street trials as experiments in interpretation”
Friday Oct 21 at 09:00 in Aud 2, IT University of Copenhagen, Rued Langgaards Vej 7, 2300
This lecture will investigate the “street trial” as a device for experimental inquiry into energy worlds. Drawing on previous work on living experiments as multifarious instruments (Murthy 2006; Roberts, 2006; Marres, 2012), I adopt a deliberately broad understanding of what counts as an experiment, and in that spirit discuss a range of different street trials involving so-called intelligent or computationally enhanced cars: a street test of a modified VW diesel car that exposed the workings of the “defeat device” installed on its engine control board; the demonstration of a driverless pod on a public square in a middle-sized UK town; an artistic experiment in the streets of New York involving a modified, remote-controlled miniature jeep. I am interested in the extend to which the publicity genre of the “street trial” is and can be deployed to reconfigure relations between innovation and the public, and whether and how this format is reconfigure-able to serve the ends of critical and creative intervention. I will pay special attention to the role of interpretation in all of this, not only because ‘achieving’ a public or collective interpretation of the problems and promises of computerized vehicles seems a crucial aspect of street trials, but also because I want to know whether the re-configuration of street trials into “experiments in interpretation” is a good objective to pursue, in social research as in public life.